• Global Warming – Everything you (not) want to know you!

  Filed under Global Warming Articles
  Mar 11

  A clever, cynical, political maxim "follow the money" – is global warming real? Global warming and human causation – are two ongoing scientific truths – or do they represent the political ideology run amok? It really is the Earth from global warming and carbon dioxide emissions of a greenhouse – and this is a real threat to the planet's oceans rise to urban centers, flood? It is caused by contempt for humanity Pollutionfossil fuels – unlimited sick for almost a century, fireplaces, factories, cars, airplanes? ) O (for the right-wing fears of a tsunami is only "propaganda" by the radical left ideologues with politicized pseudo-science "at the international level industry playing field" for capitalism and the United States to punish?

  The shocking reality (with those of casual interest) is the recent unprecedented meeting in Copenhagen for all the world leaders in December 2009-193 countries, withStaff and the whole environment: democracies, kingdoms, dictatorships, from the First Nations industry consortia in the world of the Third World to fight hunger and villages – all-a common goal: to civilization to impose severe restrictions interfere with – and financial penalties if an efficient industrial activity! What could be the forcing function to a meeting with this agenda to organize?

  Two considerations should think about giving reasonable person – given the dramatic changes and penaltiesexpected – there was a prelude to the Scientific Conference on establishing the premise of looking for the first indisputable evidence for such extreme choices you have? The disclosure of e-mails leaked to the UK shortly before the conference – the temperature data falsified attendance – in whom he had the stunned reaction of the scientific community to this challenge were of faith, dignity, where he re just a matter of confidence, global temperature rise in its financial statements? Instead, what theThe world saw was "cooked" temperature revelations swept under the carpet ", an attempt by the media to" Shoot The Messenger "(Hacker E-mail). How can interfere only in the minds of target? In the absence of an initial presentation to the World Science Show – scenario of heating, then the media cover-up – is a powerful degree of political machinations and the agenda is not unreasonable?

  Note also endorsed the House of Representatives already has a cap-and-trade bill, as if – again-man-caused global warming is proven fact – with hundreds of billions of dollars-American influence on the lives of the industry (estimated $ 1700 to $ 2000 per family per year, expect billions of GE, etc.), we 'Activities the Senate shall be signed only comparable to that in the law of President Obama! Or even worse – with the authority of the DPR, the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) has now assumed executive of the standards of the pollution is costly to the industry in the United States ( notWaiting for a bill the U.S. Senate)!

  On the other hand – if you do not accept that global warming – man-made pollution from industrial nations, an important factor in the emerging economies (eg India and China), so have no convincing argument as being part of all Planet Earth, where developed countries have so far had a huge head start advantage – the use of cheap energy and cause emissions / pollutants from carbon – in ascending order of countries should not be used, theirRight to recover "should not the United States and other industrialized countries, heavy compensation (perhaps one trillion U.S. dollars per year – mostly from the U.S.)?

  The unanimity of the international scope and scale of the Copenhagen conference has never seen, not a rebellion against the military might of the world, nor against the dominant religion, or political ideologies – only a single goal of reducing carbon and sanctions. On the right you see a political ideology in this uncontrolledunprecedented international commitment: a combination of left-wing governments and the media unite with communist dictators openly in each hemisphere. Even the commentators thought on the world stage, as Charles Krauthammer, also something wrong!

  So, mean what true scientist experts in specific technical areas of the earth? Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D., is professor of atmospheric sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and has written numerous on Subject. His analysis is summarized below in an effort to separate "the wheat from the chaff was" for men to understand – if global warming is, in fact, actually occur, whether caused by human emissions of developed proximate cause, and if the threat to the planet Earth is indeed imminent. Below are talking points Prof. Lindzen's:

  Have, despite the exaggerated statements that evokes emotions, global surface temperatures cooling cycles, as shown> Heating for more than a century: the cooling of 1875-1910, the 1911-1943 heating, cooling, 1944-1976, 1977-1998 warming, but not as warming – we are witnessing 8 years cooling. While all these changes were, the concentration of carbon dioxide has increased steadily.
  There are five centers around the world, the data in the global temperature, the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (although the recent leak of e-mailincorrect data has occurred), Remote Sensing Systems, the University of Alabama in Huntsville, Goddard Institute for Space Studies and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. All these centers temperature data show no warming since 1998, and they all show different degrees of cooling since then.
  Significant problems (for honest scientific projections) occur in the use of surface temperature records of changes in the world title: The number of climate around the world for the sampling declined from 6000 in 1970 were at less today than in 2000, two thirds of the weather stations in rural areas closed (colder temperatures at night), that those who (a high percentage of the urban centers remain the hottest night – Time Readings by concrete sidewalks, buildings and urban sprawl). This bias, because the record global temperatures, as they have urban areas of the world has grown exponentially strong in the last 50 years – studies show that perhaps half of the indicators'> Heating "in the database in the last fifty years is due to changes in land use – not increases in energy emissions. The growth of cities, making it the leading cause of human-induced increase in the temperature data.
  NASA, saying that the oceans were warmer in the summer of 2009, compared to previously cited – which is calculated by subtracting the measured temperature of the ocean from satellite ocean temperature data base – but NASA is not used (more than 3300) ARGO buoys in the world's oceans in use – theOn the contrary, the ocean heat content in-show, because the buoys were deployed in 2003.
  No statistical relationship between levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and temperatures in the past 150 years – but a strong statistical correlation between the ten-year cyclical Pacific Oscillation (PDO) and global temperature. The DOP shows a 60-year cycle of warming and cooling of the Pacific – in any case during the last 150 years, when the PDO wasCooling, global temperatures cooled, when the PDO is heating, the global temperature increases. The DOP has gone into a cooling phase – is the air temperature.
  Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere) is only 4 cents a percent (0.0004 atmosphere of the total. The total increase in the amount of carbon dioxide over the past 150 years is only one-hundredth of one percent (0.0001). This has actually benefited the agriculture and plant life, whichgrow faster, more carbon dioxide (the known animal-plant symbiosis -) the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide and are more resistant to drought.
  Carbon dioxide is a pollutant – everything is on the ground that they need to grow, the source negligible. If all the carbon dioxide taken from the air (the animals) to breathe, would die the earth.
  Ice cores show that were the increase of carbon dioxide in the past because of warmer temperatures, not the cause. The laws of nature havehas not changed. Most of the increase in carbon dioxide concentration in the air are the result of nature, the human component is small, perhaps 3 percent. In addition, half of the carbon dioxide into the atmosphere caused by human activity each year, it is immediately incorporated into the biosphere. Carbon dioxide is 3.5 percent of greenhouse gas – water vapor is 95 percent. As human activity adds only 3 percent per year, with half of that absorbed in the biosphere, the total contribution to human greenhouseEvery year, about one tenth-of-one percent. Reduce this amount by a certain group has no significant impact on global temperatures.
  There is a strong relationship (in favor of the pro-warming ignored) between the strength of the solar wind and the global temperature. Strong solar wind is equal to the hot, weak solar wind like a cooler Earth. Variations in cosmogenic isotope carbon-14 and beryllium 10 in ice cores show, dass Now, the solar wind is weakerThis is at any time that NASA was able to measure the (almost 50 years) and the earth cooling. The index is the solar magnetic field lowest level since measurements began in 1932, and is continuing to decline. The Pacific Ocean is in a cold phase and will remain so for another 25 years. The Atlantic is evidence of a slowdown. The source of the warmth of the sun is weak and probably will for the next two solar cycles. We are moving to cooler temperatures, not warmer.
  The downward trend in the amount of cyclic iceeven in the Arctic at the end of the summer is over. Polar orbiting clearly show the extent of Arctic ice, which is growing – there are 25 percent more ice are dramatically reduced much more than many decades of misleading, as two years ago (dramatic images of Arctic ice – probably intentionally).
  The satellite measurements show that there is more ice in Antarctica 30 years ago – the news media are reporting shrinking of ice in the Arctic, not on the growth of ice in Antarctica.
  FusionGlacier is not new. The "Little Ice Age" was from 1400-1850. Cooler temperatures were in the year 1600. The temperature has risen to 300 years unevenly. The glaciers are in a non-uniform for at least 250 years.
  Data from the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite shows outgoing longwave radiation (heat) of 4 watts per square meter in 1980 and 1990 increased, while cyclical warming of the oceans have been suspended. Longwave computer models planned for releaseRadiation fall as oceans warm. All models will have been wrong from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (Note later IPCC).
  Indicates a clear intention to make a political point of view, but as an honest fact, an Environmental Protection April 2009 Time magazine article said, with contributions from environmental groups, there were "only" 25,000 polar bears in the Arctic, yet – despite the fact that in 1960 was the number, but5,000

  Some important comments by Dr. Lindzen reach the heart of his concern for the scientific accuracy of the global warming "sellathon" and his motivation as possible – with "follow the money" considerations, quoted his words are specific;

  CO2 – what is it? It is not a pollutant, CO2 is a product of respiration every living creature is the product of all plant respiration, is essential for plant photosynthesis and is a product of the industrial Incineration is a product of [Auto] Help – I mean, if you've always wanted a starting time to be traveling in everything from human-to-breath control, this would be a dream. Therefore, a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.
  Major environmental groups who believe political "leaders" and eco-activists: only reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and we can adjust the temperature of the world. People who think this way are much more dangerous in the world> Heating (if true), because some of these people have a great power.
  Computer models predict that there should be a rapid warming of the upper troposphere – between 30 degrees north and south of the equator – where global warming is progressing. However, measurements show with weather balloons in the past 50 years, no type of heating. This shows the computer models can not predict how the climate system [-] available to the climate between 50 and 100 years inthe future. Computer model predictions of warming are not evidence of climate change. They are marketing tools for continuing research institutions and universities to fund our government. Despite the misgivings of motivation king, this means that the models are based on false assumptions on how the climate of complexity and are scientifically useless to make a political climate.
  United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established in late 1980, to "prove" humanBurning fossil fuels causes global warming – from its creation has never been a "scientific organization – was with an agenda of political parties formed. The ultimate goal is to capture political power by the dominant countries by climate treaty (Kyoto) — save some for the survival of institutions. These agreements give the United Nations, the legal powers to distribute wealth in developed nations. The term "debt" policy towards third world countries is justified. Debtwould be the punishment for the sins of the industrialized nations pollute "the atmosphere with carbon dioxide – by using all available storage of carbon in the air. And "the UN target for the use of global warming in order to extract money from the developed countries without working for it. Recently said the IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri:" We are at a stage where the heater at a pace occurs much faster. "Obviously not on real data.
  What Al Gore has,Nobel Peace Prize was awarded in 2007 – his message of fear that global warming is the third world now calls "climate compensation" for damages, which the West has imposed on the climate over the past 150 years. Now they say we need to "climate debt" because we all space is used for carbon in the air. This is not cause for peace and the tensions and anger in the developing countries against the West – Gore's "Peace" to promote price is below the opposite effect. RegardingGore's financial interests in companies green "conscious search prophets profits." The desire to save the world is always a cover for the necessity of the government. "
  The climategate e-mail to show that it is best to blind ambition of some of the world's leading climate scientists – and, at worst, criminal activity. The reaction of most mainstream media in the United States proves to be very interesting. Either they do not report the story or defend the actions of the climateScientists. Some of these scientists were caught intimidating scientific journals to the public skepticism PROM to hold and update data in the event for people to be global warming. The e-mails also show that these scientists have data deleted or rejected freedom-of – Request for information, and deleted e-mails in relation to these requests, a criminal offense. NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies has been an obstacle to the freedom-of-information. Of coursee-mail that have a small but powerful group of climate experts, their high positions perverting the science of climate change are used.

  Over the range of points of hard scientific data such as temperature, speed and direction, air and sea, places and events, extrapolated Dr. Lindzen his knowledge of the limitations of mathematical modeling of atmospheric speculation about the motivation for the meteorological scientists to proclaim man-made global warming .The phrase "follow the money" is often proved as reliable as a roadmap to explain the otherwise puzzling activity. Many powerful groups and organizations have strong financial interests in the American belief that carbon dioxide pollution: the national level to include an influential environmental organizations, brokerage houses, companies, universities, media and political parties and governments in the Third World. The test is widely available – cash-strapped states and cities, with hundreds ofMillions of federal funds for "green energy provided" development decades away practicality – while the programs of basic infrastructure such as water, roads and bridges, have no financial security. On stage, the United Nations, conscience and guilt liberals will have the means for the dissemination of wealth at the international level.

  Some of the comments by Dr. Lindzen Legal mandate:

  The day of the conference in Copenhagen reopened, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has claimed on jurisdictionRegulation of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States – one of them stated categorically harm "to human health.
  As the United States has an overwhelming majority of the carbon-based economy, the EPA has the authority to regulate almost everything. No institution that would emit more than 250 tonnes of C02 per year which are beyond the control of APE – more than one million buildings, hospitals, power stations, schools, businesses and enterprises alike.
  This naked assertion of broad executive (presidential) power in the name of theEnvironment is the perfect realization of the prognosis of Czech President Vaclav Klaus, is that the environment for new socialism. Be sure to include the possibility of sinister motives, points Dr. Lindzen a world of social scene – the admission of sovereihnity the United States at the United Nations, with the dominance of the United Nations for the ultra-liberal groups, and (CNC) Islamic-oil the rule of Islam.

  Similar serious concerns raised by other scientists, including expressionUN accused of "fraud" on climate change – Dr Philip Lloyd, an honorary member of the research at the Energy Research Center at the University of Cape Town, South Africa, was a co-ordinating authority for the leadership of the UN IPCC. According to Dr. Lloyd, the IPCC should be dismissed as an authority on global warming – in an article published in South Africa BusinessDay website. Dr. Lloyd writes about the errors behind the whole process "of the IPCC:

  The IPCC"claims that make thousands of scientists and almost as many visitors to their reports." However, Said Lloyd that there was no revision "in the accepted sense of the word – there was an independent union, and the hosts were far from anonymous. The result is not scientific."
  Another problem cited by Lloyd is that the problems IPCC synthesis (for Policy Makers) was published four months or more before the scientific report (about the alleged).
  Lloyd concludes: "E 'is not necessary, all the changes I have between what is said, the scientists actually said and what the politicians who wrote the summary for policy makers to identify list, they said. The process is so flawed that the result is tantamount to fraud. As an authority, the IPCC should be passed immediately forgotten. "
  Lloyd's article was first known climategate scandal that has put the validity of some of the science that supports the conclusion of the IPCC in questionHuman-induced global warming.

  Climategate In a note, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, after the outbreak of the controversy, acknowledged that the science to support artificial global warming may not be "sure, as its supporters." Even common sense commentators on the world stage, as Charles Krauthammer, is trying to find an explanation for the phenomenon of global warming, described him as "environmental protection – the newthe religion of the liberal left. "

  Tagged as: Everything, Global, Warming
  
  No Comments

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.